A Preview to the French Open

Posted by Leosash on 29th May 2007

The contenders for the men’s singles title:

060526_federerNadal_hmed_10a.hmedium1.jpg


Rafael Nadal:

Till the Hamburg final it looked like dethroning the King of Clay would be next to impossible. But after a defeat in the Hamburg finals, it looks like there could be a serious rival for Nadal’s title defense in the form of Roger Federer. Nevertheless, taking the Spaniard’s supreme confidence on the surface, his custom-made game for the surface and his unbeatable record at Roland Garros, it would be unwise to not place the world no.2 as the title favorite. Rafa goes into the tournament without the burden of having to extend his 81-match winning streak. While his side of the draw is ridden with tenacious and top-notch competitors like Hewitt, Djokovic, Verdasco and Ferrer, Nadal is expected to rise to the occasion and clinch his third French Open title.

Roger Federer:

In his Hamburg triumph it looks like Federer has finally managed to implement all his “How-to-Conquer-Nadal” plans. He steps into French Open with his confidence at a real high level and he knows that this is the best year for him to clinch the one slam that has eluded him. While there are some tough clay courters like Canas, Ferrero, Safin and Volandri in his half of the draw. If he plays at the level he has managed to play in Hamburg, he should be able to put in some real strong performances in his path to the semi finals. His opponent there could well be the inform Gonzalez or the Russian fourth-seed Nilokai Davydenko.

Fernando Gonzalez:

Gonzalez lost to Nadal in the two clay court Masters tournaments in Rome and Hamburg. While in the first match he gets completely outplayed and manages just four games, in the second match the following week he won 8 games. He was able to point out his problem against Nadal – his inability to match Nadal shot for shot in long rallies on clay. Maintaining a high level of game for the span of 5 sets could pose a problem for Fernando. However, if he manages to play the brand of aggressive tennis that he usually does and if his giant forehand clicks, his chances cannot be completely ignored. If the form-book holds good, he should be facing Federer in the semifinals.

Nikolay Davydenko:

Last year’s French Open quarterfinalist and current World No.4 Nikolay Davydenko has so far been unable to replicate the kind of success he had last year, where he managed to win five titles and did consistently well in most of the tournaments he participated in. This year his start has been pretty good with him reaching the Australian Open quarterfinals. But he has played his best match against Spanish World No.2 Rafael Nadal in the Rome semifinals. He matched Rafa consistently and was successfully in hitting clean winners in some keenly contested rallies. In that match he was the one who dictated the terms stepping well within the baseline while Nadal was pinned on the baseline or a few feet behind it in most of the rallies. Such tactics would pay off well against most of the clay-courters whose retrieving skills are at a level slightly less than that of Nadal. But his lack of experience on the big stage could be a factor that could hamper his chances. But anyone who has seen the wiry Russian take Nadal to three tough sets should not discount his chances.

The contenders for the Women’s singles title:

Henin.jpg

Justine Henin:

The two time defending champion and the three time winner of the French Open is the firm favorite for the title. Clay is Henin’s best surface and she has always been at home at the Roland Garros. In the tune-up to the French Open she just played two events. She won one and reached the semifinals at the other, not an ideal preparation by the Belgian world no.1’s standards. The Belgian is however in fine form and her past successes here should make her really confident about her chances.

Svetlana Kuznetsova:

Kuznetsova has not been able to replicate her 2004 Grand Slam success after winning that year’s US Open. She came close to that last year when she reached the final of the French Open, losing to Henin in straight sets. The Russian third seed is very comfortable on the surface, having trained on the surface for 5 years in Spain. In the final last year, she did try to overpower Henin on many occasions, a ploy that did not work too well on account of the Belgian’s superior retrieving skills. But she did beat Henin this year in the semifinals of the German Open in a tough three-setter and that win should boost her confidence for a second shot at the title.

Serena Williams:

The Australian Open this year underlined one line of thought – “never underestimate a Williams, especially if her first name is Serena.” Clay though not her favorite surface, the younger of the two Williams’ sisters did taste success on the surface in 2002, winning the title by defeating Venus in the finals. This year she is seeded 8th and is expected to meet Henin in the quarters. She is the only player in the draw who can actually beat Henin even on a day when the Belgian is playing her best tennis.

Jelena Jankovic:

The Serbian has been a revelation this year, winning two titles and reaching a couple of semifinals. Her strong backhand, excellent court-speed and physical strength should be her key strengths, while on the flipside her lack of big match practice and her supposed “nerves” might cause a problem or two. She is in Henin’s half of draw and if form permits she should be in the semifinals. But Jelena must first be focusing on a likely third-round showdown with Venus Williams.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Posted in Uncategorized | 6 Comments »

Federer Clinches his fourth Hamburg Masters Title, Beating the King of Clay

Posted by Leosash on 22nd May 2007

nadal_federer.jpg

Before playing Nadal in the second round of the Rome Masters, Daniele Bracciali’s team asked Federer to suggest how Nadal could be tackled on clay. Federer’s suggestion was simple- play a super-offensive game and it might pay dividends. While Bracciali did play an aggressive brand of tennis, he could not manage to dent Nadal’s reputation on clay. As for Federer, it appears like he has finally found the recipe for beating Nadal on clay, after coming agonizingly close on a couple of previous occasions. He finally ended Nadal’s 81-match streak on clay, beating the Spaniard 2-6,6-2,6-0 in the Hamburg Masters final.

Federer has always played well in Hamburg, the last major tune-up for the French Open. This year he won the title by beating five clay-court fanatics – Juan Monaco, Ferrero, Ferrer, Moya and Nadal – and his only straight set victory was over the 2003 French Open Champion Juan Carlos Ferrero. As for Nadal, he seemed to have run out of steam against Federer, especially in the decider of the final. Rafa’s punishing forehand was missing the lines often and he was making way too many errors. Federer on his part was pushing him way behind the baseline during many points and Nadal ran out of answers to Federer’s relentless attacking and forays to the net.

Next Stop: Paris

While both players did not seek to read too much into the result, it did succeed in strengthening Federer’s locus standi as Nadal’s strongest rival for the French Open title. Federer’s first title on clay in almost two years comes at a crucial time for the Swiss World No.1. He has split from his coach Tony Roche and has decided to go into the coming two grand slams without a coach and it appears that the decision is not after all a bad one!

Nadal on the other hand goes to Paris, without the pressure of having to extend his clay-court streak. He would however have a shot at becoming the first player since Bjorn Borg to win three successive French Open titles. To know if he is able to achieve the feat, his fans and the whole tennis world have to wait till the evening of June 10th to find out. That day another question could also be partially answered – Is Federer going to win his Calendar Slam this year?

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Nadal Conquers Rome for the Third Straight Year

Posted by Leosash on 14th May 2007

Rafael Nadal successfully defended his Rome Masters title by beating this year’s Australian Open finalist Fernando Gonzalez of Chile 6-2,6-2 in an authoritative display of clay court tennis. While winning the title Nadal did succeed to create a bunch of new records, the fact that he succeeded in avenging three of his defeats this year must be a special reason for happiness. Mikhail Youzhny, Novak Djokovic and Fernando Gonzalez have had success against Nadal this year on hard-courts, but found their weapons inadequate in threatening Nadal on clay.

52091_375x375.jpg

A disturbing news for Nadal’s rivals for this year French Open is that Nadal is playing much more aggressive than last year. He is finishing off points quickly by coming to the net, taking a lesser swing on his forehand, thus taking the ball early and his backhand too has become sharper. On the whole he is playing an attacking brand of tennis, thus spending less time on the court. His 77th straight win on clay has placed him as a firm favorite for the French Open, starting on May 27th.

No rivals on Clay:

With Roger Federer facing a dip in form and confidence, there is at present no clear rival for him for the title. The players who could do the damage are Nikolay Davydenko (lost to Nadal in the Rome semi-finals in a classic three-setter), Novak Djokovic, Roger Federer, Guillermo Canas, Fernando Gonzalez and Tommy Robredo. But whether any of them has the game or the confidence to beat the king on his favourite surface remains to be seen.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

King of Clay

Posted by Leosash on 27th April 2007

 

Nadal.jpg

 

Rafael Nadal seems absolutely unstoppable on the clay court. He has just won his 70th consecutive match on the clay court in the Barcelona Open. 

Last week, Nadal won his third consecutive Monte Carlo Masters Title –his eighth Masters Series Title – by beating World No.1 Roger Federer in straight sets, 6-4, 6-4 in just over an hour (67 minutes). The match was no patch on last year’s final between the same players, which was also won by Nadal. Coming into the finals, Federer seemed confident with comfortable wins over the 12th seeded Spaniard David Ferrer in the quarter finals (6-4,6-0) and the 16th seeded 2003 French Open Champion Jaun Carlos Ferrero in the semi finals  (6-3, 6-4). Federer was playing smooth tennis till he reached the finals and his ploy of coming to the net and finishing off points on important occasions paid well till he played Nadal in the final. 

The final started with Federer having a break-point on Nadal’s serve in the first game itself. Nadal managed to stave off that and hold his serve. The players matched each other, Federer showing his supreme shot-making ability and Nadal displaying his tenacious game tailor-made for clay. Leading 4-3, Federer had a chance to break his Nadal’s serve and go up 5-3. Nadal managed to save both those break points and held his serve. In the next game he broke his opponent’s serve and then held his own serve comfortably to close out the set. Nadal’s game plan was simple and effective- he kept attacking Federer’s backhand whenever he could and to add to Federer’s woes his forehand was quite erratic, especially in the second set. Nadal also showcased his new-found confidence in playing an attacking brand of tennis at crucial points, as he made successful forays to the net. With the first set safely in his pocket, all Nadal needed was a break in the third game of the second set to take complete command of the match. Federer’s volleys that would have been clear winners against his earlier round opponents were retrieved by Nadal and in many cases Nadal managed to hit accurate passing shots that Federer could not lay hands on.

The French Open is bound to be really interesting, with Federer chasing the one title, that could confirm his position as the greatest player of all time. But to do that he will truly need to dethrone the king from his clay court.

Technorati Tags: ,

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments »

Canas emerges from the haze

Posted by Prof on 29th March 2007

GuillermoCanas_RogerFederer_210983.jpg 

With cricket dominating the air time, most people might have missed some stunning news from the tennis world (not readers of this blog I bet!). Two times in a month! Most players would be happy to do it twice in as many years- ask Roddick. Wonder what is going through Federer’s mind. He doesn’t really like losing (duh, who does?). And while most people would shrug it off as being in minor tournaments, Federer likes to win everything he participates in - look at the record! This isn’t a big scare or anything- Federer will figure the guy out and beat him the next time they meet and everyone will forget about the two losses. But he was on the verge of the continuous victories record and I had a feeling that no one would be able to meet the mark he set now. Sadly, the streak is gone but all credit to Canas for coming back stronger from the drug use ban. It’s good that tennis isn’t getting the cricket kind of coverage in India lest people start wondering if it is the end of the Federer era or something!

Technorati Tags: ,

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments »

My dear Steffi Graf

Posted by Prof on 28th March 2007

I am a fan of Steffi Graf. Who isn’t? I found this funny video on YouTube and I decided our loyal readers deserve some fun too. So, here is the link.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments »

What’s next Roger?

Posted by Leosash on 9th February 2007

Roger Federer came to Melbourne for the year’s first grand slam – with “insufficient” match practice. At the beginning of the year he choose not to play at the Qatar Open, despite being the defending champion. His only real-match preparation for the Aussie Open was the Kooyong Classic, an exhibition tournament. And after wins over Radek Stepanek ( a tough three-setter) and Marat Safin, he lost in the final to Andy Roddick. Any other player would not classify such a lead-up before a slam as a good warm-up. But Roger Federer is not exactly any other player, is he?

Read the rest of this entry »

If you liked that post, then try these...

Women's Singles Finals, Australian Open 2007 by Prof on February 3rd, 2007
How things change! It was about 30 months ago that we saw an extremely pretty Russian girl play on the hallowed center court at Wimbledon against the Serena.

Sania crashes out, Roddick to meet Safin by Prof on January 18th, 2007
Sania, disappointment Sania Mirza disappointed yet again and crashed out of the Australian Open in the second round.

Sania Mirza moves into Round 2 of the Australian Open by Prof on January 16th, 2007
Women's Singles - 1st Round Olga Savchuk UKR 3 5 Sania Mirza IND 6 7 .

Posted in Australian Open | No Comments »

Women’s Singles Finals, Australian Open 2007

Posted by Prof on 3rd February 2007

How things change! It was about 30 months ago that we saw an extremely pretty Russian girl play on the hallowed center court at Wimbledon against the Serena. Nobody gave her any chance of beating Serena but in a display of absolutely confident tennis, Serena was stunned and a star was born. 30 months hence, women’s tennis has seen major changes: Davenport is gone, Clijsters about to go, Henin spends more time injured, Mauresmo actually won a grandslam (!), Sharapova has shown us she is no Kournikova and the Williams sisters are more interested in fashion than tennis.

Deja vu

The showdown will be repeated a few minutes from when I write this post. Serena, overweight and in bad shape has scraped and scratched her way into the finals and Sharapova has been scorching on court at times.

I had written about Serena here: “…Nobody, ever, can wake up one fine day, come out on court and expect to win.” I think Serena has the capability to prove me wrong, I guess by getting as far as she has, she already has proved her point. She is far too good for me to write her off but I don’t expect her to do a Sharapova. Will Serena make me eat my words again?

Go Maria. Let’s watch some good tennis.

Talking of good tennis, what did you guys think of the men’s semi-finals. Federer demolishing Roddick and Gonzalez repeating that against Haas. Would it be too much to expect that both of them will turn in those kind of performances come Sunday?

- Prof

Technorati Tags:
, , ,

If you liked that post, then try these...

What's next Roger? by Leosash on February 9th, 2007
Roger Federer came to Melbourne for the year’s first grand slam – with “insufficient” match practice.

Sania crashes out, Roddick to meet Safin by Prof on January 18th, 2007
Sania, disappointment Sania Mirza disappointed yet again and crashed out of the Australian Open in the second round.

Sania Mirza moves into Round 2 of the Australian Open by Prof on January 16th, 2007
Women's Singles - 1st Round Olga Savchuk UKR 3 5 Sania Mirza IND 6 7 .

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Posted in Australian Open | No Comments »

Sania crashes out, Roddick to meet Safin

Posted by Prof on 18th January 2007

Sania, disappointment

Sania Mirza disappointed yet again and crashed out of the Australian Open in the second round. She lost to Akiko Nakamura of Japan who is ranked 10 places below her in the WTA rankings. Coming off a good run in the Hopman Cup and the other lead-up tournaments, there was a promise of better things to come at the first grandslam. But unfortunately for her “billion fans” and her, an inconsistent performance proved inadequate. Let us see how she handles this loss and how the rest of this season shape up.

Roddick versus Safin

safin.jpg

 

 

If there is any player in the Australian Open draw that Roddick should want to avoid like the plague (other than Federer ofcourse), it is Marat Safin. The Russian who is making his billionth comeback is probably the second most talented man on the ATP circuit. And, he is the only guy to have beaten Federer in a Grandslam on a surface other than clay since the beginning of 2005. It is unfortunate for both players that this matchup had to happen so early in the tournament. Blame it on the mercurial Russian whose performances belie the talent he possesses.

andy-roddick.jpg

 

Roddick is in the finest form he has been in for 12 months now. The serves are powerful and clicking, the powerful backcourt shots are in place and he appears fairly confident of his place on the court. Even given all this, he would be well advised to take Safin seriously. That man coming off two exhausting five set matches must be feeling like a polar bear in Chennai. But give him an opening and he will demolish you, if he fails to self-destruct that is. Safin is his own cyanide pill. You can find a previous post on Safin here.

Given current form, Roddick should win. But I would rather watch Safin progress in the tournament because he is capable of better tennis and in my opinion, has a better chance of beating Federer. Go Marat (ideal point to crack a Borat joke or pun… none come to mind right away)!

- Prof

If you liked that post, then try these...

What's next Roger? by Leosash on February 9th, 2007
Roger Federer came to Melbourne for the year’s first grand slam – with “insufficient” match practice.

Women's Singles Finals, Australian Open 2007 by Prof on February 3rd, 2007
How things change! It was about 30 months ago that we saw an extremely pretty Russian girl play on the hallowed center court at Wimbledon against the Serena.

Sania Mirza moves into Round 2 of the Australian Open by Prof on January 16th, 2007
Women's Singles - 1st Round Olga Savchuk UKR 3 5 Sania Mirza IND 6 7 .

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Posted in Australian Open | 1 Comment »

Sania Mirza moves into Round 2 of the Australian Open

Posted by Prof on 16th January 2007

Women’s Singles - 1st Round
Olga Savchuk UKR 3 5

Sania Mirza IND 6 7

sania_mirza.jpg

Sania Mirza beat Olga Savchuk of Ukraine to advance to the second round of the Australian Open. If she moves to the third round, there is a potential matchup against the Swiss Miss, Martina Hingis.

Anybody for Mirza in the 3rd round? If yes, can she beat the Swiss Miss (whom she might meet)? How far in the tournament will Sania go?

Nice article about Sania and Anna Ivanovic finding fitness to improve their power.

Quote of the day- “The heat in Australian tans you. You can feel the sun burning your legs during changeovers. In Hyderabad, the sun isn’t that hot. I don’t know if it’s the ozone or whatever.” - Sania

- Prof

Technorati tags:

If you liked that post, then try these...

What's next Roger? by Leosash on February 9th, 2007
Roger Federer came to Melbourne for the year’s first grand slam – with “insufficient” match practice.

Women's Singles Finals, Australian Open 2007 by Prof on February 3rd, 2007
How things change! It was about 30 months ago that we saw an extremely pretty Russian girl play on the hallowed center court at Wimbledon against the Serena.

Sania crashes out, Roddick to meet Safin by Prof on January 18th, 2007
Sania, disappointment Sania Mirza disappointed yet again and crashed out of the Australian Open in the second round.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Posted in Australian Open | 6 Comments »